CONVICT CRIMINOLOGY DEFINED
Convict Criminology (CC) is a relatively new and controversial perspective in the field of corrections and the academic field of criminology. It challenges the way crime and correctional problems are traditionally represented and discussed by researchers, policymakers, and politicians. In part, CC emerged as a result of the frustration ex-convict academics experienced with the extant understanding of crime and its control. Convict criminologists are especially concerned with: (1) how the problem of crime is defined, (2) solutions proposed, (3) the devastating impacts of those decisions on the men and women “labeled” criminals (Becker, 1963; Lemert, 1967), who are locked in correctional facilities, separated from loved ones, and prevented from fully reintegrating into the community, (4) record high rates of incarceration, (5) overcrowding of penal institutions, (6) a lack of meaningful programming inside and outside of prison (7) and the structural impediments to successful re-entry that results in a revolving door criminal justice system (Richards & Jones, 1997; 2004; Richards, 2003; Maruna & Immarigeon, 2004).
As defined (see Richards & Ross, 2001:180; Ross & Richards, 2003:6), CC represents the work of convicts or ex-convicts, in possession of a Ph.D. or on their way to completing one, or enlightened academics and practitioners, who contribute to a new conversation about crime and corrections. This is a “New Criminology” led by former prisoners who are now academic faculty. The CC group tends to do research that illustrates the experiences of prisoners and ex-cons, attempts to combat the misrepresentations of scholars, the media and government, and to propose new and less costly strategies that are more humane and effective (Richards & Ross, 2003a, 2003b). The convict scholars are able to do what many previous researchers could not; merge their past with their present and provide a provocative approach to the academic study of their field. The convict criminology perspective is also based on perceptions, experiences, and analytical ideas that originate with defendants and prisoners, and are then developed by critical scholars (Richards & Ross, 2003a, 2003b).